The Facts About Home Loans in Today’s Home Mortgage Market

Obtaining a mortgage is becoming a bit easier. Credit scores required by financial institutions to qualify for a mortgage loan have been coming down. The average credit score for loans that have recently closed is down to approximately 730. This is on a scale which ranges between 300 and 850. Only a year ago, you would have needed a credit score of a minimum of 750 to qualify for a mortgage to purchase a home. You should note, that although the average credit score is approximately 730 on home loans which have recently closed, there are some financial institutions that are now offering mortgages to individuals with credit scores as low as 700. This allows more potential homeowners to have the opportunity of purchasing the American dream, a single family home.

What Are Loan to Value Ratios?

When a bank underwrites a mortgage loan application, one of the significant items they look into is called the loan to value ratio. The loan to value ratio compares the appraised value of your home to the amount of money you seek to borrow. An example of loan to value ratio is, let’s say you wanted to purchase a home that cost $400,000. If you had enough money for a 20% down payment, which would be $80,000, the loan to value ratio you would be looking for would be 80%. This simply means you wanted to obtain a mortgage of 80% of the value of the home.

Debt to Income Ratios

When banks underwrite a mortgage loan, they look into how much money you are earning. In today’s mortgage market, they only count the funds that appear on your income taxes. Money made off the books, which doesn’t appear on a tax return, will not be considered by a financial institution when underwriting a mortgage. The debt to income ratio is sometimes referred to as “DTI”. There are actually two components of the debt to income ratio. The first component is called the “front end” debt to income ratio. This represents the percentage of your total monthly income you will have to utilize to make your mortgage payment. The second debt to income ratio is referred to as the “back end DTI”. The represents the percentage of your total gross monthly income you will pay towards your mortgage plus all other debt obligations. This would include car payments, personal loans, money owed to American Express, Mastercard, Visa, gas station credit cards, store credit cards, and all other financial obligations.

Let’s look at an example of debt to income ratios. Let’s assume your total family income is $8,000 per month. For this example, let’s use a mortgage payment of $2,000 per month and other financial obligations of an additional $2,000 per month. In this example your front end debt to income ratio would be 25% and your back end debt to income ratio would be 50%. Banks are currently using front end debt to earnings ratios of 25% and back end debt to earnings ratios of approximately 38%. These are more liberal percentages than banks were using approximately a year ago.

Conclusion

Although the easy money days regarding mortgage financing are gone, banks are now being more reasonable with prospective homeowners with regard to loosening their standards to obtain mortgages.

helping homeowners stay in their homesElliot Schlissel is a foreclosure attorney. For more than 45 years, Elliot and his associate attorneys have been litigating all types of real estate and foreclosure cases. Elliot’s goal is to help his clients stay in their homes and fight off foreclosure lawsuits brought by financial institutions. He also assists his clients in obtaining mortgage modifications on their homes.

Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale Vacated The Case To Be Brought Back to the Foreclosure Settlement Part

foreclosure defense lawyerJP Morgan Chase had initiated a foreclosure legal action and had been granted summary judgment. In addition, a referee was appointed to compute with regard to the sale. The property never was sold at auction. JP Morgan Chase thereafter brought a proceeding before Justice Francesca Connolly in Westchester Supreme Court requesting the Order of Reference and Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale be vacated. They took this action because they claim they were unable to comply with Administrative Order 431-11. Justice Connolly granted JP Morgan Chase’s unopposed application. The Order of Reference and Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale were vacated. Thereafter, Chase brought a motion for summary judgment again and for another Order of Reference. The court decided the defendants were entitled to have the matter sent back to the foreclosure settlement conference part.

Since the property involved was residential which was occupied by the owners of the property, and the action was started before September 1, 2008, and a final judgment had not been entered, it was appropriate that the defendants had a statutory right to request the matter be sent back to the foreclosure conference part to try to settle the matter with the bank.

assisting homeownersElliot Schlissel is a foreclosure lawyer with more than 45 years of legal experience, who has successfully represented homeowners throughout the Metropolitan New York area in foreclosure lawsuits.

Judge Sanctions Bank for Foreclosure Activities: The Appellate Division Reverses the Sanctions

foreclosure defense lawyersJohn Lucido, who had been a mortgage broker, had taken out a mortgage loan, in March of 2007, of approximately $500,000 with regard to his Rocky Point, Long Island New York home. He was unable to make his mortgage payments and in 2009, Bank of America brought a foreclosure lawsuit in Suffolk County, New York.

Foreclosure Court Conferences

There were numerous foreclosure mediation conferences. However, Lucido had been ill and his wife had died during the course of the litigation. This complicated the issues that were dealt with at the foreclosure conferences. At the time of the foreclosure mediation conferences, Lucido represented himself. The conferences were held pursuant to New York Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3408, which states “both the plaintiff and the defendant shall negotiate in good faith to reach a mutually agreeable resolution with regard to residential foreclosure lawsuits.”

Judge Spinner’s Ruling

The case was heard before Judge Spinner sitting in a Foreclosure Court Part in Suffolk County. Judge Spinner, in April 2012, ruled Bank of America had “deliberately acted in bad faith.” He had made this ruling because they had delayed six months in producing a pooling and servicing agreement. Judge Spinner also stated Bank of America gave “material misstatements of fact” which had been calculated to deceive the court and also cause delay of the court proceedings. Judge Spinner went on and held the bank had misinformed the court that the pooling and servicing agreement which controlled Mr. Lucido’s mortgage specifically forbade principal reductions. Later the bank acknowledged there was no bar to principal reductions in the pooling and servicing agreement.

Judge Spinner in his decision forever restrained Bank of America from “demanding, collecting or attempting to collect, directly or indirectly” sums related to the $493,209 mortgage that were either “interest, attorneys’ fees, legal fees, costs and disbursements.” He had held the bank could only collect principal and any funds advanced by the bank related to property taxes or insurance on the property. In addition, Judge Spinner imposed $200,000 exemplary in damages against the bank. This cut the bank’s principal to $293,219.

The Appellate Division Overrules

The Appellate Division of the Second Department, an appeals court, overruled Judge Spinner’s decision in its entirety. The Appellate Division held he did not have the authority to impose that level of penalties against Bank of America. The Appellate Division held the bank’s conduct did not justify the sanctions imposed by Judge Spinner and sent the case back to Judge Spinner for further proceedings. The appellate court took into consideration Lucido’s “unfortunate situation.” However, they held the record on appeal “reveals the conduct of the plaintiff in this case was not so egregious as to merit the imposition of sanctions against it.” The fact Bank of America refused to give Lucido a principal reduction and they had delayed in producing documents did not, in and of itself, amount to a failure to act in good faith.

Conclusion

Judge Spinner’s remedy was unusual, but there have been other cases that have upheld the tolling of interest when banks do not negotiate in good faith. I believe Judge Spinner was looking to send a message to financial institutions to be more cooperative at the foreclosure mediation conferences. Unfortunately, the Appellate Division did not agree.foreclosure advocate for homeowners

Foreclosure Fraud – Part II

foreclosure defense lawyersRent to Buy Scams

A common foreclosure scam involves individuals approaching a homeowner whose home is in foreclosure and offering to have them refinance the home at a much lower interest rate. Unfortunately, the way this scam works is the homeowner is presented with documents that involve the transfer of the deed from the homeowner to the alleged foreclosure counseling company. The homeowner eventually finds out that he or she does not own their home and is now renting their home from the alleged foreclosure counseling company. Eventually the counseling company brings an eviction proceeding to evict the homeowner from their home and they thereafter try to sell the property or bring another rent paying tenant into the property.

The rent to buy scams also sometimes involve the tricking of the homeowner into signing documents that are presented to be applications for a home loan. However these applications actually are documents utilized to transfer the title of the property. Homeowners should be especially wary of signing any type of blank forms. In this type of scam the scammer presents a blank form to the homeowner and says “don’t worry we will fill it out and work with the bank to obtain a lower interest loan.” When the form is eventually filled out it turns out to be a document transferring title to the house.

Hire Attorneys Experienced in Defending
Homeowners In Foreclosure Lawsuits

The best way to ensure you are not being scammed and that your rights are being protected is to hire an attorney with a significant background in real estate and foreclosure defense matters to represent you with regard to foreclosure related issues concerning your home. When you hire a qualified attorney, you should request that you receive copies of all documents and paperwork in your file to make sure that the attorney is doing all that is necessary to protect your rights and interests.

homeowner advocatesElliot Schlissel is an attorney with more than 45 years of experience representing clients in real estate related legal matters. Elliot and his team of attorneys have one of the busiest foreclosure defense law firms in the Metropolitan New York area. Elliot helps his clients stay in their homes, obtain mortgage modifications and take all other necessary actions to avoid losing their homes in foreclosure.

Methods of Avoiding Foreclosure

Everyone who buys a home expects to be able to make their mortgage payments. Unfortunately, there are numerous hardships and problems in one’s life that may cause you to fall behind in making your mortgage payments. A death in the family, the loss of a job, a divorce, a disability or medical problem are just a few of the hardships that can occur that can cause you to fall behind on your mortgage payments.

Foreclosure is the start of proceedings to take back a home for non-payment of the mortgage. There are a number of strategies that can be utilized by a homeowner to avoid having their home being foreclosed.

Loan Forbearance Agreement

A loan forbearance agreement is a temporary arrangement between the homeowner and the bank. The purpose of the forbearance agreement is to give the homeowner a reasonable period of time to catch up on his or her mortgage payments. This gives the homeowner time to catch his or her breath! If the homeowner makes the agreements under the forbearance agreement they can become up to date on their mortgage.

Loan Modifications

The Home Affordable Mortgage Program (HAMP) was created by President Obama during his first administration. It still remains in effect in his current second term as President of the United States. This is a federal program that virtually all financial institutions are part of. The benefit of this program is it gives the homeowners who have fallen behind on their mortgage a chance to reduce their mortgage payments. The unfortunate part of the program is that it is an extremely poorly managed program by the individual banks and only approximately 1 in 5 people who apply for mortgage modifications are successful in obtaining them. In addition to President Obama’s mortgage modification program, many banks have their own internal mortgage modification programs. In theory, mortgage modification programs take into consideration the home’s current value, interest rates and the ability of the homeowner to make payments under this program.

Negotiated Short Sale

A negotiated short sale is a transaction where the homeowner contacts the bank and advises the bank they would like to sell the house which is currently under water (currently worth less than the amount of the mortgage). The bank, in a short sale, appraises the house and in the appropriate situation agrees that the house can be sold for less than the amount of the mortgage and the bank will satisfy the mortgage for less than they are owed. The writer of this article is not a big proponent of short sales. Short sales should only be undertaken at the end of the foreclosure process to avoid a deficiency judgement.

Bankruptcy

In the event you file a bankruptcy, you obtain a stay from a Federal Court that prevents a lender from moving forward with a foreclosure lawsuit in a New York State Court. In a Chapter 13 bankruptcy you enter into a plan to become current with your mortgage over a period of up to 5 years. In a Chapter 7 bankruptcy you eliminate the personal loan obligation portion of your debt. Therefore if the bank forecloses on your home, all they are entitled to receive is what they obtain from the sale of the house. They will not be able to obtain a deficiency judgment against you.assistance for homeowners

Foreclosures Hit Long Island Hard

foreclosure defense attorneyThe foreclosure crisis on Long Island is much more serious than in the rest of the country. On a national basis, approximately 2% of all homes were in foreclosure during the month of January 2014. However, on Long Island, 6.3% of all homes were in foreclosure. That is three times the national average.

Long Island real estate has not recovered as fast as the rest of the nation for a variety of reasons. The court rules concerning foreclosures are designed to protect homeowners. However, the legal protection afforded homeowners impacts on the length of a foreclosure process through the courts in New York. During the 2013 calendar year, 663 homes were sold at auction in foreclosure on Long Island.

Rising Home Prices

Home prices have been rising on Long Island. The rising home prices allows more homes to be sold quickly and should have an impact on reducing the number of homes in foreclosure. The average home price, excluding homes on the east end of Long Island, during the last quarter of 2013 were sold for approximately $360,000. This is up approximately 3% from 2012.

Superstorm Sandy Impacts Homes on Long Island

The large number of homes on Long Island damaged by Superstorm Sandy has had a significant impact on the number of homes going into foreclosures. Many homeowners spent all of their savings bringing their homes back to liveable condition after Superstorm Sandy. However some of those homeowners overspent and fell behind on their mortgages while trying to rectify the problems caused by Superstorm Sandy to their homes.

Delinquency Rates on Long Island Are High

It is estimated approximately 10% of all mortgage loans on Long Island are more than 90 days past due. This is double the national average of 5% of mortgage loans which are 90 days past due.

assisting homeownersElliot Schlissel and his associates maintain one of the busiest foreclosure defense law firms in the Metropolitan New York area. Elliot has been interviewed on radio and in newspapers concerning foreclosure defense issues and is widely considered to be one of the best and well known foreclosure defense lawyers in the Metropolitan New York area.

Deficiency Judgments After Foreclosure

foreclosure defense lawyersDeficiency Judgments

A deficiency judgment can be taken against you when your property is sold at a foreclosure sale for less money than you owe on the mortgage. By example, if you owe on your mortgage $500,000 and your property sells in foreclosure for $300,000, the financial institution can take a deficiency judgment against you for the balance of the $200,000 that you owe. Lenders will go after deficiency judgments, generally speaking, if they feel you have an ability to pay the balance of the judgment off.

Deficiency judgments are not automatic. The attorneys for the foreclosing bank must engage in further legal action to obtain a deficiency judgment against you. In cases where the financial institution does not believe that you have the capability of paying a deficiency judgment, they generally won’t go after a deficiency judgment.

How To Avoid Deficiency Judgments?

There are a variety of ways of avoiding a deficiency judgment. One of these involves selling your home at a short sale and having the bank agree they will not go after you for any deficiency between the amount the property is sold for and how much you owe. The second route to avoiding a deficiency judgment is filing a bankruptcy.

Deficiency judgments are taken against you in New York State Courts. If you file a bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court, under federalism, the federal court that you file the bankruptcy in is a higher court than the New York State court. You can discharge any deficiency owed by you with regard to your mortgage by filing a Chapter 7 bankruptcy in a Federal Court. In addition to avoiding a deficiency judgment, you can also avoid credit card debts, personal loans and other financial obligations by filing a bankruptcy.

Foreclosure Lawyer

There are a specific set of laws dealing with deficiency judgments in foreclosure lawsuits. These statutes are complicated. Each and every foreclosure situation is a separate individual case with different facts and different circumstances. The purpose of this article is to educate you that deficiency judgments can occur. Should you have concerns about a deficiency judgment or other issues in foreclosure legal action, it is important you contact an experienced, knowledgeable foreclosure defense lawyer to represent you.assistance for homeowners

Squatters Rights to Foreclosed, Vacant Homes

Squatters Rights to Foreclosed, Vacant HomesThere is a misunderstanding that squatters can walk into foreclosed homes which are vacant and end up the owner of the homes. What squatters refer to concerning extra-legal possession of homes actually refers to the legal concept of adverse possession. Adverse possession deals with openly and notoriously being in possession of property, in the State of New York, for a period of ten years. In the appropriate circumstances, should the squatter live openly and notoriously in the vacant home for ten years, they can claim ownership of the property.

Squatting Equals Trespassing

The theory of adverse possession actually deals with property boundary disputes. Under adverse possession theory, the boundary between neighboring properties can be changed if one owner has utilization of the other owner’s property around the boundary line for a period of ten years.

Squatters sneak into homes when no one is around. This is usually undertaken by vagrants or homeless people. Adverse possession of the home can only be claimed if the squatter lives openly and notoriously for a period of ten continuous years in the residence.
What most squatters are doing is trespass on someone else’s property. Sometimes during foreclosure cases, homes are vacant for a period of time. This period of time will usually not last ten years, the period of time necessary for a squatter to claim open and notorious adverse possession rights to a property.

Former Owners Remaining in the Home

In a foreclosure proceeding, the home in the State of New York can be sold on the courthouse steps. At the time of the sale, the homeowner whose home is being foreclosed upon will most likely still be living in the home. After the sale takes place, the new owner of the home can bring a landlord tenant case to evict the former homeowners from their home. The failure of the homeowners to move from the house after it is sold, in foreclosure, does not create an adverse possession situation. Eviction proceedings can be time consuming. During the course of the eviction proceeding, the former homeowners would be entitled to stay in their home until such time as the court grants an order forcibly removing them from the home.

Conclusion

Squatting in an abandoned, foreclosed home and creating ownership rights based on the legal theory of adverse possession is unlikely to happen!assistance for homeowners

Foreclosure Dismissed – Citibank Has No Standing

foreclosure defense lawyersIn a case before Justice Lizbeth Gonzalez, in the Supreme Court of Bronx County, the judge dismissed a foreclosure lawsuit brought by Citibank.

Citibank had filed a foreclosure proceeding against a homeowner named McCray. They had taken this action on behalf of a Bears Stearns Alt-A Trust. McCray brought a motion requesting the foreclosure lawsuit be dismissed. He argued Citibank had lacked standing to bring the lawsuit. Citibank claimed it had standing to bring the lawsuit because it was the holder of the original note.

Holder or Assignee of the Note and Mortgage

Judge Gonzalez in her decision stated a foreclosing party in a foreclosure lawsuit has standing when they are both the holder or assignee of the mortgage and underlying note at the time the action is commenced.

Citibank’s attorneys had argued they were the holder of the note. However, their legal submissions did not state they also were the holder of the mortgage.

Motion to Dismiss Case Granted

Judge Gonzalez found that there was no proof submitted by Citibank they were the holder of both the mortgage and the note at the time of the initiation of the lawsuit. The court therefore granted McCray’s motion to dismiss. Judge Gonzalez found that Citibank did not submit adequate proof it had the right to the debt in the absence of documentation of chain of custody and proof the mortgage and notes were lawfully assigned and held by it prior to commencing the lawsuit. Since Citibank did not establish and meet the requirements they had standing to bring the foreclosure lawsuit, Judge Gonzalez held that they did not have standing to foreclose and their foreclosure lawsuit was dismissed.

Conclusion

Before a financial institution can bring a foreclosure lawsuit they must be able to prove that they are the holder of both the note and mortgage. In addition, they must show that the mortgage has been rightfully assigned to them and the assignment was properly filed. The documentation of the assignment, the possession of both the note and the mortgage, should be attached to the summons and complaint in the foreclosure legal action. If the financial institution does not do this, the court should dismiss the case for lack of standing.

assistance for homeownersElliot S. Schlissel is a foreclosure defense attorney. His office has helped homeowners in scores of cases fight foreclosures and remain in their homes.

Stopping Foreclosure in Its Tracks

foreclosure defense attorneysTimes are tough in New York right now. Many businesses have downsized their employees. This has caused layoffs. It is harder to make a living in New York today than it was in earlier decades. Financial difficulties can cause stress. The ultimate problem consumers face is when they receive notice the bank is going to foreclose on their home and put them on the street. Receiving notice your home is going into foreclosure can be deflating. However help exists.

You can take legal action to stop foreclosures from moving forward in New York. You do not have to surrender to the financial institutions and be forced out of your home at a time when your credit is at its lowest point. Hiring an experienced, dedicated foreclosure attorney can make the difference between continuing to live in your home and being forced out of it.

There are numerous steps a foreclosure defense lawyer can take to help homeowners. Forbearance agreements can be negotiated. Mortgage modifications can be submitted. Mortgage modifications can sometimes reduce the principal, provide lower interest rates and more flexible terms. Some lenders are willing to defer significant portions of the mortgage indebtedness to later points in time. When applying for a mortgage modification, it is important the homeowner show financial difficulties. Mortgage modifications are designed to help homeowners who are in distress. Our foreclosure defense lawyers can counsel you with regard to the best route to take with regard to mortgage modifications.

Federal House Authority (FHA) Mortgages

There are special programs set up by the Federal House Administration with regard to homeowners who lose their jobs and have financial difficulties paying their mortgages. The program for unemployed homeowners can excuse the homeowner from paying their mortgage for a period of up to one year. During this period of time, the bank will be unable to foreclose. Our foreclosure attorneys can help you prepare the necessary paperwork and make the application to participate in this program. We can also intercede with regard to the bank or financial institution to help you deal with your current financial difficulties.

Foreclosure Court Proceedings

Foreclosure lawsuits are started by the service of a Summons and Complaint by the financial institution’s attorneys on the homeowner. When a homeowner receives a Summons and Complaint they have between twenty and thirty days to take action to stop the foreclosure in its tracks. Our law firm, when defending a homeowner, immediately files between eighteen and twenty five affirmative defenses. We also regularly countersue (sue the bank) as part of the lawsuit. The squeaky wheel gets more grease is an expression. We stand out from the crowd when defending our clients in foreclosure lawsuits. We pressure the financial institutions to make mortgage modifications and/or withdraw their lawsuits. Legal action can be taken to tie the cases up in court any where from three to six years in the Metropolitan New York area.

In Foreclosure? Do Not Despair

The worst thing you can do if your bank threatens to sue you in foreclosure or serves a Summons and Complaint upon you is to do nothing! If you take no action to defend yourself in the court by submitting a written answer to the bank’s lawyer and to the court, you default. By defaulting, you give the financial institution a win. It is like lying down to die. Don’t do it.

assisting homeownersIf you are facing foreclosure, call us. We will offer you a free consultation. We will provide you with a road map as to what we can do to keep you in your home and defend you in the foreclosure lawsuit. We will give you a written itemized retainer which shows what we will charge you, the basis of our charges, and what we can do for you. Help exists. God helps those who help themselves. If you have foreclosure problems, call us. We are the law firm that can help you. The phones at our law office are monitored 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. We can be reached at 1-800-344-6431, 718-350-2802 or 516-561-6645.

Foreclosure Defense in Valley Stream, Lynbrook, Baldwin, Malverne, Freeport, Oceanside, Long Beach, Elmont, Lakeview, West Hempstead, Hempstead, Merrick and Bellmore, New York

We represent individuals throughout the New York Metropolitan area with divorce and child custody, personal injury, car accident, wrongful death, estate administration, nursing home and medicaid issues

The information you obtain at this website is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your particular legal issue. This is attorney advertising.

This is attorney advertising. This website is designed for general information purposes only. The information presented on this website shall not be construed to be legal advice. If you have a legal problem you should consult with an attorney.

Copyright © 2018 By The Law Offices of Schlissel DeCorpo. All Rights Reserved.