foreclosure – Page 9

Losing Your Home

November 15, 2013 by Elliot S. Schlissel

When you have financial problems it can turn your life upside down. Financial problems cause anxiety and stress. One of the worst and most problematic financial problems is when you cannot make your mortgage payments. Failing to make mortgage payments over a period of 3 months or more can result in the financial institution that holds the mortgage on your home bringing a foreclosure lawsuit. Foreclosure is the bringing of a lawsuit for purposes of the financial institution reclaiming the ownership of the home. In the end, if the financial institution is successful in the foreclosure proceeding, they can evict the homeowners from their home.

Under Water Homes

Many homeowners bought their homes in the years 2002 through 2008 when home prices were rising. Many of the homes facing foreclosure today are worth less than the amount of money due and owing on the mortgages.

Fighting Foreclosure Lawsuits

A foreclosure lawsuit is initiated by the attorneys for the bank filing, in the County Clerk’s office in the County where the home is located, a Summons and Complaint in Foreclosure. Simultaneously with filing the Summons and Complaint in the County Clerk’s Office, the financial institution also files a Lis Penden which notifies anyone who conducts a title search the house is now involved in a foreclosure lawsuit. After the summons and complaint is filed with the county clerk’s office, the attorney for the financial institution hires a process server who serves the summons and complaint on the homeowners. The summons and complaint can be served personally on the homeowners, by nailing it to the door and mailing it to them, and/or by serving a person of suitable age and discretion at the homeowners residence or principal place of business. So, what do you do if you are served with a summons and complaint?

Foreclosure Defense Lawyers

There are attorneys who have extensive experience in litigating foreclosure lawsuits. Foreclosure lawyers can explain the process to you. They can investigate and see whether the financial institution that is suing you actually has the right to sue you. They can look into whether Truth in Lending Laws were complied with. They can investigate as to whether New York Laws concerning the assignment of mortgages and the execution of affidavits related to the foreclosure lawsuit have been properly undertaken. Homeowners are consumers and there are consumer protection laws in the State of New York and Federal Laws that protect homeowners from unfair practices by financial institutions.

Mortgage Modification

Many homeowners apply for mortgage modifications get rejected and assume that there is nothing that can be done. That is not correct. The first stage of a foreclosure lawsuit is the attendance by the financial institution and the attorney for the homeowner at a foreclosure court conference. At this time, pressure can be brought on the financial institution of cooperate and to act in good with regard to the underwriting of a mortgage modification application. Even if the homeowner has been turned down in the past, the homeowner can file a new mortgage modification at no cost as part of this process.

Procedural Defenses

There are a number of procedural defenses that can be raised in a foreclosure lawsuit by a sophisticated foreclosure defense lawyer. The writer understands that the homeowner actually received the money and purchased the house. This does not prevent the homeowners from protecting their legal rights under Federal and State consumer protection laws with regard to unfair banking procedures, fraudulent foreclosure practices and being defrauded regarding misleading documents.

Conclusion

Don’t despair. If your home goes into foreclosure, hire the right lawyer and you may be able to stay in your home longterm!

New York’s Backlog of Foreclosure Cases

November 7, 2013 by Elliot S. Schlissel

The foreclosure process in New York, even under optimum circumstances, can take as long as three years. New York has enacted legislation regarding the robo-signing scandal that was uncovered in 2010. There are new court imposed rules affecting attorneys representing banks that seek to bring foreclosure lawsuits.

New Foreclosure Requirements

The attorneys for financial institutions must prepare an affidavit or swear under penalties of perjury that the foreclosure documents being submitted are accurate. Consternation by lender’s attorneys with regard to the accuracy of notes, mortgages and assignments of mortgages have caused delays as long as two years in the New York foreclosure process.

Lenders themselves must verify, when a foreclosure action is initiated, that the lender has the right to sue. This deals with the issue of standing. Notes and mortgages are sold as commercial paper. If the sale is not accompanied by an appropriate assignment from one bank to another, the second bank has no right to bring a foreclosure lawsuit.

The delays in foreclosure proceedings can cause interest and penalties to accrue against the homeowner.

Foreclosure Settlement Conferences

When a foreclosure lawsuit is initiated in the State of New York, the homeowner is entitled to attend a foreclosure settlement conference. At these conferences, judges and their staff seek to mediate foreclosure issues and assist homeowners in obtaining mortgage modifications. Unfortunately, the reality is many of the homeowners whose homes have gone into foreclosure could not afford, when they bought the homes, to pay the mortgages and due to the economic crisis facing America have even less capability today of paying their mortgages.

Elliot S. Schlissel, Esq. is a foreclosure defense lawyer representing homeowners throughout the metropolitan New York area who seek to fight foreclosure lawsuits.

Filed Under: Foreclosure, Foreclosure Defense, Mortgage Modification Tagged With: defective foreclosure lawsuits, defective mortgages, foreclosure, foreclosure attorney, foreclosure defense, foreclosure defense attorneys, foreclosure proceedings, mortgage modification, New York foreclosure defense lawyers

Surging Foreclosures on Long Island

November 5, 2013 by Elliot S. Schlissel

As the mortgage crisis is fading in many parts of the United States, it is still heating up on Long Island. More than 1,300 foreclosure cases have been filed in the first eight months of 2013. This is more than a 50% increase during the same eight month period of 2012. Foreclosures have been increasing on Long Island even while there have been significant drops in foreclosure proceedings brought in other areas of the country.

Darren Blomquist, the Vice President of RealtyTrac, recently stated “we’re definitely seeing the Long Island area buck the national trend when it comes to foreclosure activity.” Long Island has more than double the national average of mortgages that are significantly behind on their payments. In July of this year, more than eight percent of all homes in Suffolk County and six percent of all homes in Nassau County were either in foreclosure or moving towards being sued in a foreclosure proceeding.

Why Foreclosure Persists on Long Island

There are numerous reasons why Long Island has had a higher level of foreclosures than the rest of the country. The foreclosure process is long and drawn out in the State of New York. Long Island was an area that had more than the national average of high risk home mortgage loans. Long Islanders also lost many high paying jobs. The new jobs that have been created in the past few years on Long Island tend to be minimum wage or low wage positions.

Mortgage Modification Problems

Long Islanders are facing similar problems to homeowners in other states facing foreclosure. The mortgage modification process does not work well. There are approximately 45,000 homes facing foreclosure on Long Island. For those families, the recent rise in the sales price of homes is not helping them out of their financial difficulties.

Filed Under: Foreclosure, Foreclosure Defense, Mortgage Modification Tagged With: foreclosure, foreclosure attorney, foreclosure crisis, mortgage modification, mortgage modification attorneys, New York foreclosure attorney, New York foreclosure defense lawyers

What Do You Need to Know Before Buying a Home?

November 2, 2013 by Elliot S. Schlissel

When buying a home, prospective purchasers need to look at all of the factors involving the home. They should not be overly focused on the most attractive details of their prospective purchase. Sometimes prospective purchasers fall in love with the kitchen or the bathrooms. While an attractive kitchen and modernized bathrooms are important, there are other factors to be taken into consideration when purchasing a home.

The Home’s Condition

Before purchasing a home, every prospective purchaser should hire an engineer for the purpose of looking into the heating system, plumbing system, electrical system, checking that the roof doesn’t leak, and looking into the structural integrity of the house. The engineer should be especially careful to look into whether the house has drainage issues and/or whether it floods in heavy rainstorms.

Location, Location, Location

Before purchasing a house you should drive around the house’s neighborhood. You should look into how far the house is from schools, public transportation, and stores. Purchasing a house in an area that has an excellent school district adds value to the house and will help your children advance in their lives and careers.

Taxes

The amount you will be paying each year for school taxes and real estate taxes should be a significant factor in making a decision as to whether this is the right home for you. Unfortunately, taxes usually go up. You should take into consideration how much the taxes in this area have risen in the last few years and plan to pay higher taxes in the future on the home.

Nuisances

Are there businesses, factories or other circumstances nearby the prospective home that will cause either a noise, pollution or general type of nuisance for you?

Home’s History

Some people are very superstitious about buying a home where individuals died or were murdered in. If this is an issue for you, you should look into the history of who owned the home and what happened to those former homeowners.

Meeting Your Needs

Lastly and most importantly, the home must meet your needs. Are there enough bedrooms? Will there be enough space in the home? Above all, can you really afford this home?

Elliot S. Schlissel, Esq., for more than 45 years has been representing homeowners with regard to the purchase and sale of single family homes. In addition, Elliot and his aggressive associates fight foreclosure lawsuits, help their clients obtain mortgage modifications, and are well known foreclosure lawyers.

Filed Under: Foreclosure Tagged With: foreclosure, foreclosure attorney, foreclosure defense, foreclosure defense attorneys, foreclosure defense lawyers, foreclosure proceedings, mortgage modification attorneys, real estate, real estate attorneys

JP Morgan $13 Billion Settlement for Bad Mortgage Practices

October 31, 2013 by Elliot S. Schlissel

For months now, JP Morgan Chase and the Justice Department have been in negotiations with regard to a settlement resolving federal allegations concerning the bank’s sale of faulty mortgage securities. The Justice Department’s position is the sale of these faulty mortgage securities was a major factor in the mortgage/real estate crisis in America. The $13 Billion penalty would be the largest penalty ever paid by a single institution. The Justice Department has been investigating JP Morgan Chase for many months with regard to its activities concerning mortgage backed securities. In the event this settlement is entered into, it would be a major win for the Justice Department. JP Morgan Chase is the largest bank in the country. This settlement will not stop the federal government from bringing criminal charges against JP Morgan Chase. However, the deal would end a New York State lawsuit brought by Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman and an investigation in the State of California.

HSBC and Barclay’s Bank Fined Also

Attorney General Holder has in the past levied multimillion dollar fines against other large financial institutions which includes both HSBC and Barclay’s Bank.

JP Morgan seeks to resolve this investigation regarding its conduct in recent years. As a result of this investigation, the bank’s first quarter report showed a loss. This was the first quarterly loss for JP Morgan Chase in ten years. The bank’s Chief Executive Officer, Jamie Dimon, seeks to resolve these investigations into the bank’s conduct. With this in mind, he is taking a conciliatory approach in his dealings with regulators. He has stated that the problems JP Morgan is facing are “painful.”

In 2011, JP Morgan Chase was one of the eighteen banks sued by the Federal Housing Finance Agency. That suit was to recoup losses sustained by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with regard to bundled securities that were improperly underwritten as home loans.

Elliot Schlissel is a foreclosure defense lawyer. Elliot and his associates litigate foreclosure lawsuits and they help their clients obtain mortgage modifications. Elliot and his aggressive associates work hard to keep their clients living in their homes.

Filed Under: Foreclosure, Foreclosure Defense, Mortgage Modification Tagged With: defective foreclosure lawsuits, defective mortgages, financial crisis, foreclosure, foreclosure attorney, foreclosure defense, mortgage modifications

Appearance at a Foreclosure Settlement Conference Considered an “Informal Appearance” and not a Default by the Mortgagor

October 7, 2013 by Elliot S. Schlissel

In a case of first impression, Justice Jack Battaglia sitting in Supreme Court Real Property Part in Kings County, New York, dealt with an issue as to whether the appearance by the mortgagor at the mandated Foreclosure Court Conference part in Kings County without submitting a formal written answer to the summons and complaint can be considered an informal appearance denying the financial institution the ability to claim the homeowner was in default.

In this case, the financial institution brought a summary judgment application to the Court. A summary judgment motion claims there are no issues of fact and therefore no trial is necessary. The basis for the summary judgment was the default by the mortgagor, Butler, in this proceeding. There were two prior applications by the financial institution but questions concerning the affidavit of service caused them to be denied. The Judge had the case sent over to the Foreclosure Settlement Conference Part for mandatory foreclosure settlement proceedings.

Mr. Butler made numerous appearances at the Foreclosure Conference Part. The judge questioned whether since Butler appeared in the action in the Foreclosure Conference Part, how could she be “in default” for purposes of entering a judgment on default. The Court took the position, under New York case law, what Butler made was called an “informal appearance” within the time specified in the Summons and Complaint.
This is covered by New York Civil Practice and Rules § 320(a). The judge therefore entered a decision that Butler was not in default. A motion to enter judgement based on default could not be granted since Butler was not in default. Butler had participated in court conferences pursuant to this informal appearance. It should be noted, Butler appeared twenty-five times in the Foreclosure Conference Settlement Part and several other times before the court. The financial institution’s application for a default judgment was denied.

Elliot S. Schlissel is a foreclosure defense attorney representing homeowners throughout the metropolitan New York area. Elliot and his staff of attorneys have been keeping homeowners in their homes for more than 45 years.

Filed Under: Foreclosure, Foreclosure Defense Tagged With: defective foreclosure lawsuits, defective mortgages, foreclosure, foreclosure attorney, foreclosure defense, foreclosure defense attorneys, foreclosure defense lawyers, foreclosure proceedings, New York foreclosure attorney

New Law Helps Homeowners: Part I

October 2, 2013 by Elliot S. Schlissel

The New York State legislature has passed a new statute which has an effective date of August 30, 2013. The statute impacts in the manner and procedures utilized by financial institutions and their attorneys commencing foreclosure proceedings within the State of New York.

Certificate of Merit

All foreclosure actions commenced after August 30, 2013, will require a Certificate of Merit. This document must be attached to the Summons and Complaint. The Certificate of Merit requires the attorney for the plaintiff to certify he or she has reviewed all of the facts in the case. In addition, the attorney will have to certify based on consultation with representatives of the plaintiff, (financial institution) who is identified in the certificate, that the attorney has taken the time to review pertinent facts and documents related to this proceeding. The attorney will have to review the mortgage, the security agreement, the note or the bond underlying the mortgage. Only after this review, if there is a reasonable basis for the starting of a foreclosure lawsuit, can the attorney at that point bring a proceeding to foreclose.

Note and Mortgage

This new statute will require the attorney for the plaintiff to attach a copy of the note and the mortgage to the Summons and Complaint. In addition, the attorney will have to attach all documents evidencing transfers leading from the original financial institution to the current plaintiff showing all documents have been appropriately filed and the party bringing this lawsuit has standing to sue the homeowner.

In the event the attorney and/or the financial institution does not completely comply with these new requirements the judge handling the case will have full authority to dismiss the foreclosure proceeding. In addition, the judge will have authority to deny all accrued interest and other financial expenses that increase the amount of the indebtedness owed by the debtor during the entire long foreclosure process.

Filed Under: Foreclosure, Foreclosure Defense Tagged With: Certificate of Merit, foreclosure, foreclosure attorney, foreclosure defense, foreclosure defense attorneys, foreclosure proceedings, New York foreclosure attorney, Standing to sue

Mortgage Servicing Agencies’ Failure to Perform Their Duties

September 26, 2013 by Elliot S. Schlissel

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is the new agency that is supposed to regulate mortgage servicing companies. In a recent review of mortgage servicing companies this agency found some services to be “sloppy” when dealing with transferring paperwork when loans are sold. They also found misapplication of payments on mortgages and the failure of mortgage servicing companies to pay the taxes on the homeowners’ homes on a timely basis.

Homeowners Don’t Know Whom They Are Supposed To Pay

When the average homeowner purchases his or her home they take out a mortgage. Often shortly after they take out their mortgage the mortgage is sold by one lender to another. The second lender thereupon hires a mortgage servicing company to service the loan. Sometimes, a few months later, the second lender sells the mortgage to a third lender. This leaves the homeowner unsure of where, and to whom, they should pay their mortgage. This causes consumers consternation as to whether they are making their payments to the correct entity and if they are receiving the full credit for their payments.

Consumers Financially Injured By Mortgage Servicing Companies

Tax payments on real estate are usually due and owing in December. There have been mortgage servicing companies that have delayed making these payments until January. When a mortgage servicing company pays the taxes in the following year, the homeowner loses the important tax deduction for the mortgage payment in the prior year. This causes the homeowner to pay higher income taxes due to the loss of this tax deduction.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has set up a new mandated set of rules financial servicing companies must comply with. These rules go in effect in January of 2014. The purpose of these rules is to deal with issues that have come up during the mortgage loan modification process which have been exposed under the HAMP program. The following are a list of some of the problems that have been uncovered by this agency concerning mortgage services:

Abnormally long application processes.
The lack of quality control standards and the supervising of underwriters.
The failure to send out denial notices to homeowners.
The failure to have written policies and procedures related to mortgages.
Disorganization and understaffing by mortgage servicing companies.

Mortgage Modifications

Many homeowners have been living with the panacea that they can obtain a mortgage modification for their home under the HAMP program only to find out that only a small number of the applicants get final approval of mortgage modifications. Hopefully this agency will deal with the numerous problems that exist today.

Elliot S. Schlissel, Esq. is a foreclosure attorney who has published more than fifty (50) articles related to foreclosure defense.

Filed Under: Foreclosure, Foreclosure Defense Tagged With: defective foreclosure lawsuits, foreclosure, foreclosure attorney, foreclosure defense, foreclosure defense attorneys, foreclosure defense lawyers, foreclosure proceedings

Wells Fargo Sanctioned By Court For Bad Foreclosure Practices

September 20, 2013 by Elliot S. Schlissel

Justice Yvonne Lewis, sitting in Supreme Court in Kings County recently sanctioned Wells Fargo for “wantonly flagrant” bad faith involved in a residential foreclosure lawsuit. Justice Lewis in her decision stated that Wells Fargo had repeatedly frustrated the efforts by two brothers, Francis Ruggiero and Michael Ruggiero to obtain a mortgage modification. They continually demanded more and more financial information.

The Ruggiero brothers owned a home in East New York. They refinanced their home in 2006 with Wells Fargo. They fell behind in their mortgage in 2007. In May of 2007, Wells Fargo initiated a foreclosure action against them.

Court Settlement Conference

At a court settlement conference, the parties agreed to a three month trial mortgage modification. The Ruggerio’s made the first payment under the modification and then missed the next two. At subsequent settlement conferences, the Ruggerio’s claimed they had not been given a trial mortgage modification. Wells Fargo claimed they needed more information for a final determination on their mortgage modification for the Ruggerio’s. Wells Fargo, at the foreclosure conference, requested the Ruggiero’s make further payments under the temporary mortgage modification. However, every time the Ruggerio’s made the payments, they were rejected by Wells Fargo.

In the end, Wells Fargo denied the mortgage modification application. However they offered to modify the mortgage for $2,672.70 per month. This was $600 a month more than the amount under the trial modification by Wells Fargo.

There were further additional settlement conferences before the court. The Ruggiero’s submitted a further package of financial information to Wells Fargo but Wells Fargo took no action concerning this new information. Eventually, Wells Fargo said it would not offer a loan modification, but would reconsider if the Ruggiero’s again submitted a financial package. In the end Wells Fargo never approved a mortgage modification for the Ruggiero’s.

Lack Of Good Faith By Wells Fargo

Judge Lewis in her ruling stated the case is “replete with pervasive indicia of the plaintiffs lack of good faith, evidenced by conflicting information, a refusal to honor agreements, unexcused delays, unexplained charges and misrepresentations and sets forth, in no small measure, a failure to deal honestly, fairly and openly.” The Judge went on to state, “more to the point, it is irrefutable on the proof adduced that the defendants, despite being subjected to ten to twelve arbitrary submissions, successfully established their occupancy of the subject premises, successfully completed the plaintiff’s trial HAMP period, and submitted all required documentation in order to accord themselves a modified loan agreement in the amount of $2,061.50 which the plaintiff in turn, arbitrarily and capriciously increased by $611.20 under false pretenses without any justifiable basis, and ingenuously denied.”

Justice Lewis went on to state that the monetary penalty’s she was imposing on Wells Fargo was necessary because of Wells Fargo failure to comply with the HAMP program.

Filed Under: Foreclosure, Foreclosure Defense, Mortgage Modification Tagged With: defective foreclosure lawsuits, foreclosure, foreclosure attorney, foreclosure defense, mortgage modification, mortgage modification attorneys, mortgage modification denied, mortgage modification denied new york, Mortgage Modifications attorney

City Seeks To Save Homes Through Eminent Domain

September 18, 2013 by Elliot S. Schlissel

The City of Richmond, California has come up with a unique plan. The city sent notices to the institutions holding more than 600 underwater mortgages. The city asked these institutions to sell the mortgages to the city. The city offered to buy the mortgages for 80% of the fair market value of the homes. The City intended on writing down the mortgages for the purpose of helping the homeowners refinance their properties.

Investment Group Brings Lawsuit To Stop The City

An investment group filed a lawsuit in a Federal Court in California. They seek to prevent the City from using Eminent Domain to seize mortgages of local residents who owe more than the value of their property. The investment group claimed “the purpose of the lawsuit is to protect retirees and save them from an unlawful and unconstitutional seizure of private property and to prevent severe damage to the country’s home mortgage market.” The investment group requested the court stop Richmond, California from moving forward with its program and to declare its plan to seize mortgages as being unconstitutional. The City of Richmond claimed the lawsuit is without merit and their plan is appropriate.

Since the case is in its infancy, we’ll see how things work out in the future. However if the city is willing to seize its resident’s underwater mortgages, make a deal with the institutions holding those mortgages to pay them a fair amount for the mortgages and thereafter the homeowner’s refinance their homes for a lesser amount, it looks like a win-win situation for all parties involved.

Foreclosure Defense Lawyer

Elliot S. Schlissel, Esq. is a prominent foreclosure lawyer representing homeowner’s against financial institutions throughout the metropolitan New York area. Elliot and his associates aggressively litigate foreclosure lawsuits and assist their clients in obtaining mortgage modifications.

Filed Under: Foreclosure, Foreclosure Defense, Mortgage Modification Tagged With: foreclosure, foreclosure attorney, foreclosure defense, mortgage modification, mortgage modification attorneys, Mortgage Modification new york attorney

Losing Your Home

New York’s Backlog of Foreclosure Cases

Surging Foreclosures on Long Island

What Do You Need to Know Before Buying a Home?

JP Morgan $13 Billion Settlement for Bad Mortgage Practices

Appearance at a Foreclosure Settlement Conference Considered an “Informal Appearance” and not a Default by the Mortgagor

New Law Helps Homeowners: Part I

Mortgage Servicing Agencies’ Failure to Perform Their Duties

Wells Fargo Sanctioned By Court For Bad Foreclosure Practices

City Seeks To Save Homes Through Eminent Domain

Contact Us

Categories

LINKS

OUR WEBSITES

Latest Blogs

CHAPTER 13 BANKRUPTCY

Foreclosure Strategies

CONTACT INFO

View Our General Web Site

View Our Child Protective Website

View Our Fathers Rights Web Site

View Our Wills & Trusts Website

View Our Bankruptcy Web Site