defective foreclosure lawsuits

Town of Brookhaven Taking Action Against Banks Who Failed to Maintain Foreclosed Properties

December 18, 2013 by Elliot S. Schlissel

Town officials in Brookhaven are moving forward to take action against financial institutions which have failed to maintain hundreds of homes and other structures they have taken title to in foreclosure lawsuits. During the past twelve months, town workers have been forced to board up more than three hundred homes that have fallen into disrepair which are owned by financial institutions as a result of foreclosure proceedings. Town of Brookhaven Supervisor Edward P. Romaine, recently stated “banks let the houses fall apart; did not adequately maintain them and didn’t stay in touch with the local government.”

Foreclosed Homes Devalue Their Neighbors’ Property

It is estimated when a home goes into foreclosure and falls into disrepair it has a negative financial impact on the surrounding homes of approximately $10,000 to $20,000. In addition, vacant homes attract drug dealers and prostitutes.

Property Registration Law

The Town of Brookhaven is in the process of passing a property registration law related to vacant homes. The statute would have a registration fee of $100 for a home or building which has been vacant for less than a year. The failure of financial institutions to comply with this regulation would cost them between $1,000 and $15,000 in fines. The statute would also allow the Town of Brookhaven to place liens on vacant homes and buildings for maintenance work the Town is forced to do. This maintenance work would also include maintaining the property, cutting the grass and trimming trees.

Councilwoman Jane Bonner from Coram has taken the position banks should be held accountable for homes they have taken back in foreclosure. She maintains a strong position it is not the government’s responsibility to maintain property owned by financial institutions.

Conclusion

Foreclosures not only remove families from their homes. They have a negative effect on the surrounding homes and create blights in the neighborhood if the foreclosed homes are not maintained.

Filed Under: Foreclosure, Foreclosure Defense Tagged With: defective foreclosure lawsuits, foreclosure, foreclosure attorney, New York foreclosure attorney, real estate, real estate market

Federal Government Moves Against Banks

December 16, 2013 by Elliot S. Schlissel

The United States government has brought several lawsuits against some of the largest banks in the world. The purpose of these lawsuits was to hold these banks accountable for their mortgage fraud practices. As a result of legal action, JP Morgan Chase entered into a settlement whereupon they have to pay $5.1 billion dollars to the regulator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. This settlement dealt with allegations related to toxic mortgage securities packaged and sold by JP Morgan Chase which was one of the causes of the financial crisis in America. This settlement was part of a larger settlement involving a $13 billion dollar payment between JP Morgan Chase and federal and state officials with regard to the bank’s improper mortgage practices.

Bank of America

A federal jury has found Bank of America was responsible for mortgage fraud during the financial crisis. Prosecutors in the case are asking for approximately $850 million dollars in damages from Bank of America.

Banks Charged for Their Bad Behavior

It is important that the government, even though it is long after the fact, is taking the appropriate legal action to find banks responsible for their wrongdoing which created the mortgage crisis in America.

Homeowners Not Compensated

The settlement between the federal government, JP Morgan Chase and Bank of America allocates approximately $4 billion dollars in financial relief to homeowners who were victimized by improper mortgage practices. Considering the hundreds of billions of dollars homeowners have lost, this is a mere pittance. The government should have required a much larger fine from JP Morgan Chase for its improper mortgage actions and mortgage fraud.

Conclusion

The government’s action concerning illegal mortgage practices taken against large banks is too little too late!

Filed Under: Current Events, Foreclosure, Foreclosure Defense, Mortgage Modification Tagged With: defective foreclosure lawsuits, defective mortgages, financial crisis, foreclosure attorney, foreclosure crisis, foreclosure defense, mortgage modifications, New York foreclosure defense lawyers, predatory lending

Courts Flooded with New Foreclosure Cases in New York

December 12, 2013 by Elliot S. Schlissel

It is estimated approximately 45,000 foreclosure cases will be filed in the Supreme Courts of the State of New York in 2013. It is anticipated more foreclosures will be filed in 2013 than in 2011 and 2012 combined in Courts.

The increase in court filings relates to lenders’ ability to provide documentation of their foreclosure lawsuits concerning the accuracy of the foreclosure filings. There was an affirmation requirement imposed by Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman in October 2010, requiring attorneys for financial institutions bringing foreclosure proceedings to attest to the validity of the material in the foreclosure Complaint. On August 30, 2013, a “Certificate of Merit” replaced the attorney’s affirmation. The Certificate of Merit requires the financial institution and its attorneys to document the institution bringing the lawsuit has the mortgage and note and can document the assignments of the mortgage and note from prior financial institutions to them.

Foreclosure Settlement Conferences

Each foreclosure proceeding in the State of New York is subject to a Foreclosure Settlement Conference. More and more homeowners are retaining attorneys to represent them in foreclosure proceedings in New York. Homeowners are utilizing foreclosure lawyers to represent them at the Foreclosure Conferences for the purpose of pressuring financial institutions into granting the homeowners mortgage modifications. It is estimated there will be more than 100,000 Foreclosure Settlement Conferences taking place in the State of New York before the end of the year 2013. The huge number of settlement conferences is causing the legal system in New York to be overburdened.

Approximately half of the homeowners represent themselves at the settlement conferences. Unfortunately, most homeowners representing themselves have difficulties at the settlement conferences and do not obtain good outcomes. Legal representation has a significant impact on the success rate of resolving the foreclosure lawsuits to the homeowners’ benefit.

Filed Under: Foreclosure, Foreclosure Defense, Mortgage Modification Tagged With: defective foreclosure lawsuits, defective mortgages, foreclosure, foreclosure attorney, mortgage modification denial, New York foreclosure attorney

Home Loans Will Be Harder to Obtain in 2014! – Part II

December 5, 2013 by Elliot S. Schlissel

Fewer Foreclosures in the Future

The creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) may make it more difficult for financial institutions to foreclose on homes owned by homeowners who have stopped making mortgage payments. “For every foreclosure, lenders will have to show the CFPB that there was absolutely no way they could do anything else” according to Gaffney. This will require financial institutions to offer homeowners behind in their mortgage, additional options other than foreclosure. Those options may involve short sales, refinancing, cash for keys arrangements (these are arrangements where lenders pay delinquent homeowners to hand over the keys to their residence and walk away from their homes) and other potential options. Due to the necessity of offering these alternatives, lenders may become concerned that taking back homes from delinquent homeowners will be more difficult. This may result in more conservative underwriting requirements by lenders which will end up shutting more prospective homeowners out of the marketplace to obtain mortgages.

Ability to Pay Rules

Under the new rules going into effect in 2014, financial institutions will have less latitude in evaluating prospective homeowners regarding mortgages. The lender will have to take into consideration the “ability to pay” of the prospective borrower. The following are a list of the new rules lenders will have to take into consideration in underwriting new mortgages in 2014:

Current or reasonably expected income or assets;
Credit history;
Monthly mortgage payments;
Current employment status;
Current debt obligations, (alimony, child support, credit card bills);
Monthly payments on other loans;
Monthly payments on mortgage related obligations; and,
Monthly debt to income ratio or residue income.

Debt to Income Ratio

The debt to income ratio under the new rules will create problems for many families who seek to obtain mortgages. Under the new rules going into effect on January 1, 2014, the monthly debt to income ratio will be set at a maximum of 43%. This means homeowners will not be able to utilize more than 43% of their income to pay all of their financial debts. These debts will include car loans, credit cards, personal loans, and other financial obligations over and above the prospective mortgage they seek to obtain.

Conclusion

Applying for a mortgage in 2014 is going to be more difficult. If you are interested in obtaining a mortgage, apply now!

Filed Under: Foreclosure, Foreclosure Defense, Mortgage Modification Tagged With: defective foreclosure lawsuits, defective mortgages, financial crisis, foreclosure, foreclosure attorney, foreclosure defense, foreclosure defense attorneys, mortgage modification, Mortgage Modifications attorney, New York foreclosure attorney

How Good Does Your Credit Score Have To Be To Obtain a Low Interest Rate Mortgage?

November 29, 2013 by Elliot S. Schlissel

If you are in the market to buy a new home or an existing home, one of the most important issues is whether you can afford the mortgage payments. But before you can consider whether you can make your mortgage payments, you need to obtain the mortgage. Credit scores are the most important factor financial institutions look into with regard to underwriting mortgage loans. Today it is recommended individuals applying for a mortgage have a credit score of 740 or above. Credit scores are based on a total potential perfect credit score of 850 points. The 740 credit score that is requested by financial institutions today is among the highest asked by banks at any point in time. Pursuant to www.zillow.com, a mortgage information company, approximately 40% of Americans have credit scores high enough to obtain the best possible mortgages.

Mortgage Rejection Rate

There is currently a 30% rejection rate by financial institutions for those individuals applying for a mortgage. When you take into consideration the housing market has been improving in the United States, and foreclosure rates have been going down in most metropolitan areas, a 30% rejection rate is very high.

So what do you do if you do not have a 740 or above credit score? You can still obtain a mortgage. However, you will most likely have to pay a higher interest rate for the mortgage.

Credit Reports

Before going into the housing market to look for a home to purchase you should check your credit score. You can obtain a copy of your credit report on the internet. Carefully look at your credit report to determine if all the material on your report is accurate. If there are inaccuracies in your credit report contact the credit reporting agency in writing to correct these inaccuracies. Your credit report will also show you the balances on credit lines, personal loans, and credit cards. It will be helpful to bring the balances on your indebtedness down prior to submitting a mortgage application. Banks take into consideration all of your overall debt when they underwrite a mortgage.

Elliot S. Schlissel is a foreclosure attorney with extensive experience in representing clients regarding foreclosure lawsuits, mortgage modifications and fraudulent mortgage practices of banks. His goal is to help clients stay in their homes.

Filed Under: Foreclosure, Foreclosure Defense, Mortgage Modification Tagged With: defective foreclosure lawsuits, defective mortgages, financial crisis, foreclosure, foreclosure attorney, foreclosure crisis, foreclosure defense, mortgage modifications, predatory lending

Issue of Standing in Foreclosure Lawsuit is Waived By Failure to Plead It In The Defendant’s Answer

November 22, 2013 by Elliot S. Schlissel

Columbia Capital had loaned Mr. Cuervo $130,000. They had received a mortgage against real estate owned by Mr. Cuervo as security for this loan. Mr. Cuervo had executed a note and a mortgage to Columbia Capital at the time of the closing on the purchase of the property.

Summary Judgment Motion

Columbia had made an application for summary judgment. Their application was based on their cause of action for foreclosure. (A summary judgment motion sought to have the court render a decision there was no question of fact that the plaintiff, in this case, was entitled to a judgment based on their allegations and no trial was necessary). In their summary judgment application Columbia asked the court to strike all of the affirmative defenses made by the defendant.

Columbia Claims Mortgage is in Arrears

Columbia claimed that Mr. Cuervo did not make his mortgage payments pursuant to the note and mortgage and that they were entitled to summary judgment because there were no issues of fact in the case. The opposition papers submitted by Mr. Cuervo’s attorney alleged Columbia did not have standing to bring this lawsuit. (Lack of standing means Columbia was not the appropriate party to move forward with this foreclosure lawsuit).

Justice Peter Mayer sitting in the Supreme Court in Suffolk County held the opposition submitted by Cuervo’s attorney did not raise any questions of fact. It did not rebut Columbia’s prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment. Judge Mayer went on to state the failure to raise as an affirmative defense the issue of standing by Mr. Cuervo’s attorney acted as a waiver concerning this potential defense to the lawsuit. In other words, since Cuervo didn’t plead a lack of standing, the Court would not hear arguments as to whether there actually was a lack of standing for Columbia to bring this foreclosure proceeding.

Columbia’s application for summary judgment was granted by Judge Mayer.

Conclusion

Defense counsel should allege a lack of standing in all foreclosure lawsuits. At the time the answer is submitted by the defendant, the defendant is usually not in a position to know whether the plaintiff has standing. These issues are clarified during the discovery process of the lawsuit.

Filed Under: Foreclosure, Foreclosure Defense Tagged With: defective foreclosure lawsuits, defective mortgages, foreclosure, foreclosure attorney, foreclosure defense, foreclosure defense attorneys, foreclosure proceedings, New York foreclosure attorney

Federal Government Seeks $863 Million from Bank of America For Defective Mortgages

November 20, 2013 by Elliot S. Schlissel

The United States government has gone into the Federal District Court in New York City requesting Bank of America pay $863.6 million dollars in monetary damages related to fraudulent activities concerning defective mortgages which were sold by Countrywide Financial Services in 2008. It is claimed Bank of America defrauded Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, government controlled mortgage companies, with regard to the sale of loans purchased from Countrywide in 2007 and 2008. These mortgage loans generated $1 billion dollars in losses.

The Hustle

The case filed in United States District Court in Manhattan claims Countrywide operated a program called high speed swim lane or HSSL, nicknamed the “Hustle”. The Hustle program was set up to provide financial incentive for employees to make as many loans as possible. The program eliminated many underwriting requirements to ensure loans met minimum standards. The government’s position is penalties are necessary “to send a clear and unambiguous message that mortgage fraud for profit will not be tolerated” stated Judge Jed S. Rakoff, who presided over the trial in this matter. The amount of the penalties requested is based on the losses Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac incurred.

Elliot Schlissel, Esq. is a foreclosure attorney representing homeowners concerning mortgage modifications and foreclosure litigation.

Filed Under: Foreclosure, Foreclosure Defense, Mortgage Modification Tagged With: defective foreclosure lawsuits, defective mortgages, financial crisis, foreclosure, foreclosure attorney, foreclosure crisis, foreclosure defense, foreclosure defense attorneys, mortgage modification attorneys, New York foreclosure defense lawyers, predatory lending

US Bank and Wells Fargo Violate Duty to Negotiate in Good Faith at Mandatory Foreclosure Settlement Conference

November 19, 2013 by Elliot S. Schlissel

Justice Robert Torres, sitting in Supreme Court in Bronx County, recently ruled US Bank and Wells Fargo were barred from collecting any interest, unpaid late fees or attorney’s fees until a homeowner was given an appropriate review and determination of his mortgage modification application. A foreclosure action was brought against a homeowner named Rodriguez in Bronx County.

Rodriguez brought an application to find that US Bank and the loan servicer on this mortgage, Wells Fargo Bank, had violated their duties and obligations under the HAMP guidelines to negotiate in good faith at a foreclosure settlement conference. Rodriguez took the position Wells Fargo mishandled and misapplied the HAMP guideline with regard to his application for a mortgage modification. He further argued both US Bank and the loan servicer, Wells Fargo, had failed to act in good faith as required by financial institutions under the HAMP program.

Court Rules Against the Banks

Justice Torres found that Rodriguez had provided sufficient documentation to his allegations concerning the violation of the good faith requirement by the financial institutions at the settlement conference. His decision stated in this foreclosure proceeding, the financial institutions did not follow HAMP guidelines such as violating section 3408(f) regarding the duty to proceed in good faith. The Court took into consideration the presentation by Rodriguez’s representative that Wells Fargo did not explain why they refused to evaluate him under Tier 1 and Tier 2 programs. Under the HAMP guidelines a loan servicer must evaluate the homeowner pursuant to these guidelines. Judge Torres’ ruling stated Wells Fargo had not complied with the current HAMP directive and failed to work towards a loan modification in good faith.

Conclusion

Financial institutions must cooperate and work with homeowners and evaluate mortgage modification applications pursuant to the HAMP guidelines.

Elliot S. Schlissel is a foreclosure attorney representing homeowners in foreclosure lawsuits. His office seeks to keep their clients in their homes by helping them obtain mortgage modifications and by challenging the foreclosure lawsuits brought by financial institutions, and countersuing them for violating federal and state laws.

Filed Under: Foreclosure, Foreclosure Defense, Mortgage Modification Tagged With: Bankruptcy mortgage modification, defective foreclosure lawsuits, foreclosure, foreclosure attorney, foreclosure defense, foreclosure defense attorneys, mortgage modification attorneys

Losing Your Home

November 15, 2013 by Elliot S. Schlissel

When you have financial problems it can turn your life upside down. Financial problems cause anxiety and stress. One of the worst and most problematic financial problems is when you cannot make your mortgage payments. Failing to make mortgage payments over a period of 3 months or more can result in the financial institution that holds the mortgage on your home bringing a foreclosure lawsuit. Foreclosure is the bringing of a lawsuit for purposes of the financial institution reclaiming the ownership of the home. In the end, if the financial institution is successful in the foreclosure proceeding, they can evict the homeowners from their home.

Under Water Homes

Many homeowners bought their homes in the years 2002 through 2008 when home prices were rising. Many of the homes facing foreclosure today are worth less than the amount of money due and owing on the mortgages.

Fighting Foreclosure Lawsuits

A foreclosure lawsuit is initiated by the attorneys for the bank filing, in the County Clerk’s office in the County where the home is located, a Summons and Complaint in Foreclosure. Simultaneously with filing the Summons and Complaint in the County Clerk’s Office, the financial institution also files a Lis Penden which notifies anyone who conducts a title search the house is now involved in a foreclosure lawsuit. After the summons and complaint is filed with the county clerk’s office, the attorney for the financial institution hires a process server who serves the summons and complaint on the homeowners. The summons and complaint can be served personally on the homeowners, by nailing it to the door and mailing it to them, and/or by serving a person of suitable age and discretion at the homeowners residence or principal place of business. So, what do you do if you are served with a summons and complaint?

Foreclosure Defense Lawyers

There are attorneys who have extensive experience in litigating foreclosure lawsuits. Foreclosure lawyers can explain the process to you. They can investigate and see whether the financial institution that is suing you actually has the right to sue you. They can look into whether Truth in Lending Laws were complied with. They can investigate as to whether New York Laws concerning the assignment of mortgages and the execution of affidavits related to the foreclosure lawsuit have been properly undertaken. Homeowners are consumers and there are consumer protection laws in the State of New York and Federal Laws that protect homeowners from unfair practices by financial institutions.

Mortgage Modification

Many homeowners apply for mortgage modifications get rejected and assume that there is nothing that can be done. That is not correct. The first stage of a foreclosure lawsuit is the attendance by the financial institution and the attorney for the homeowner at a foreclosure court conference. At this time, pressure can be brought on the financial institution of cooperate and to act in good with regard to the underwriting of a mortgage modification application. Even if the homeowner has been turned down in the past, the homeowner can file a new mortgage modification at no cost as part of this process.

Procedural Defenses

There are a number of procedural defenses that can be raised in a foreclosure lawsuit by a sophisticated foreclosure defense lawyer. The writer understands that the homeowner actually received the money and purchased the house. This does not prevent the homeowners from protecting their legal rights under Federal and State consumer protection laws with regard to unfair banking procedures, fraudulent foreclosure practices and being defrauded regarding misleading documents.

Conclusion

Don’t despair. If your home goes into foreclosure, hire the right lawyer and you may be able to stay in your home longterm!

Filed Under: Foreclosure, Foreclosure Defense, Mortgage Modification Tagged With: defective foreclosure lawsuits, foreclosure, foreclosure attorney, foreclosure defense, foreclosure defense attorneys, foreclosure proceedings, mortgage modification, mortgage modification attorneys, New York foreclosure attorney, New York foreclosure defense lawyers

New York’s Backlog of Foreclosure Cases

November 7, 2013 by Elliot S. Schlissel

The foreclosure process in New York, even under optimum circumstances, can take as long as three years. New York has enacted legislation regarding the robo-signing scandal that was uncovered in 2010. There are new court imposed rules affecting attorneys representing banks that seek to bring foreclosure lawsuits.

New Foreclosure Requirements

The attorneys for financial institutions must prepare an affidavit or swear under penalties of perjury that the foreclosure documents being submitted are accurate. Consternation by lender’s attorneys with regard to the accuracy of notes, mortgages and assignments of mortgages have caused delays as long as two years in the New York foreclosure process.

Lenders themselves must verify, when a foreclosure action is initiated, that the lender has the right to sue. This deals with the issue of standing. Notes and mortgages are sold as commercial paper. If the sale is not accompanied by an appropriate assignment from one bank to another, the second bank has no right to bring a foreclosure lawsuit.

The delays in foreclosure proceedings can cause interest and penalties to accrue against the homeowner.

Foreclosure Settlement Conferences

When a foreclosure lawsuit is initiated in the State of New York, the homeowner is entitled to attend a foreclosure settlement conference. At these conferences, judges and their staff seek to mediate foreclosure issues and assist homeowners in obtaining mortgage modifications. Unfortunately, the reality is many of the homeowners whose homes have gone into foreclosure could not afford, when they bought the homes, to pay the mortgages and due to the economic crisis facing America have even less capability today of paying their mortgages.

Elliot S. Schlissel, Esq. is a foreclosure defense lawyer representing homeowners throughout the metropolitan New York area who seek to fight foreclosure lawsuits.

Filed Under: Foreclosure, Foreclosure Defense, Mortgage Modification Tagged With: defective foreclosure lawsuits, defective mortgages, foreclosure, foreclosure attorney, foreclosure defense, foreclosure defense attorneys, foreclosure proceedings, mortgage modification, New York foreclosure defense lawyers

Town of Brookhaven Taking Action Against Banks Who Failed to Maintain Foreclosed Properties

Federal Government Moves Against Banks

Courts Flooded with New Foreclosure Cases in New York

Home Loans Will Be Harder to Obtain in 2014! – Part II

How Good Does Your Credit Score Have To Be To Obtain a Low Interest Rate Mortgage?

Issue of Standing in Foreclosure Lawsuit is Waived By Failure to Plead It In The Defendant’s Answer

Federal Government Seeks $863 Million from Bank of America For Defective Mortgages

US Bank and Wells Fargo Violate Duty to Negotiate in Good Faith at Mandatory Foreclosure Settlement Conference

Losing Your Home

New York’s Backlog of Foreclosure Cases

Contact Us

Categories

LINKS

OUR WEBSITES

Latest Blogs

Foreclosure Strategies

Foreclosure And Your Credit Score

CONTACT INFO

View Our General Web Site

View Our Child Protective Website

View Our Fathers Rights Web Site

View Our Wills & Trusts Website

View Our Bankruptcy Web Site