STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS DEFENSE TO FORECLOSURES

Picture of a 2 story home

The statute of limitations for a foreclosure action is six years. This six year statute of limitations period begins to run from the date the entire mortgage balance is accelerated and called due by the financial institution. Once the lender has accelerated the mortgage, If the homeowner makes a payment, it will not restart a new six year period for the statute of limitations to expire.

FORECLOSURE LAWSUITS

Homeowners often believe that banks are very efficient and very accurate with regard to their paperwork. However, this is not necessarily true. Mortgages and notes are freely transferred from banks to other financial institutions. There are sometimes numerous delays, the misplacement of documents and/or the bank simply fails to act to collect on its mortgages. Therefore, the issue as to whether six years has passed since the acceleration of the mortgage is an issue that should be looked into with regard to defending foreclosure lawsuits.

CASES PENDING FOR SIX YEARS

Homeowners often come to our office and say, “well this lawsuit was brought in 2010 and now it’s 2016, and therefore the statute of limitations has expired.” This is not correct. The statute of limitations start from the period the mortgage accelerated and ends when the lawsuit is initiated. Therefore, even if a lawsuit was stated in 2010 and it lingered on for six years there would be no statute of limitations defense. If that lawsuit is dismissed, would the statute of limitations then have expired? The answer to that is both yes and no. Although the statute of limitations in that example would have expired, the bank would be given an additional 60-day grace period to start a second lawsuit to foreclosing on the home.

CONCLUSION

NY Foreclosure Defense Attorney Elliot Schlissel

The statute of limitations is a viable defense to foreclosure lawsuits and should be plead in the homeowner’s answer in the appropriate circumstances to effectuate this defense.

Elliot S. Schlissel, Esq. Is a foreclosure lawyer representing the homeowners throughout the metropolitan New York area.

REAL ESTATE MARKET IS HOT ON LONG ISLAND

Home in Long Island

The real estate market on Long Island is heating up. Nassau County had a 25% increase in home sales in the month of March 2016 as compared to March of 2015. In Nassau county 934 homes were sold in March of 2016 whereas only 740 homes were sold in March of 2015. Suffolk County has also showed an increase amount of home sales in March 2016. However, it was only approximately 8% higher than the home sales rate was in 2015.,/p>

The average home sales in March 2016 in Nassau County went for $430,000.00.

NEW YORK CITY RESIDENTS FIND BARGAINS ON LONG ISLAND

The price of small apartments in New York City averages over $1,000,000.00 Manhattan residence who come to Long Island looking for homes find the homes are a bargain compared to what they pay for small co-ops or condos in Manhattan. The quality of schools on Long Island is also a significant factor for residents living in Manhattan to buy homes on Long Island. The homes on Long Island are larger than Manhattan Apartments and many Long Island towns have excellent school districts.

Elliot-Schlissel

Elliot S. Schlissel is an attorney that represents clients throughout the metropolitan, New York area with regard to real estate transactions, real estate litigation and foreclosure defense.

FORECLOSURE ACTION DISMISSED: BANK DID NOT HAVE A PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER THE HOMEOWNER

A House

In a case pending in Kings County, New York before Justice Robyn Garcin, a defendant named Acevedo sought to restore a prior motion to dismiss the foreclosure lawsuit brought against him by Deutsche Bank. The bank had an affidavit from their process server that claimed that Acevedo was served at 272 Etna Street. The service of the Summons and Complaint was made at that address, the bank claimed, to person of suitable age and discretion and thereafter a copy of it was mailed to Acevedo at that address.

ACEVEDO MOVED IN 2009

Acevedo, in his motion papers, documented that he had not resided at 272 Etna Street since 2009. He therefore argued that the service of the Summon ad Complaint was not properly effectuated at his him or the place he resided. The attorneys for the bank claimed Acevedo waived the defense of of lack of personal jurisdiction by failing to commence a motion to dismiss the lawsuit within 60 days of service of the original date of service of his answer to the Summons and Complaint. However, Justice Robyn Garcin found that due to the circumstances involved in this case Acevedo should not be held to the 60 day limitation with regard to making a motion to dismiss a Summons and Complaint based on improper service. Justice Garcin, in her opinion stated that: “the initiation of the lawsuit by serving Acevedo at the wrong address was defective and therefore the foreclosure lawsuit was dismissed.

Elliot S. Schlissel, Esq. is a foreclosure defense attorney representing homeowners throughout the metropolitan New York area for more than 45 years.

Elliot-Schlissel

VIDEO: The Statute of Limitations Defense

Video: Mortgage Modification, Stay In Your Home!

Elliot discusses mortgage modification and how to stay in your home if you are facing foreclosure.

Video: Underwater Homes & Foreclosure

In this video Elliot discusses the subject of underwater homes and foreclosure.

Loan Modifications: What Are They Really? Part: 2

Dollar BillsThe first step in obtaining a mortgage modification is for the homeowner to apply to their bank, loan servicing organization or the investor holding their mortgage for a modification. This requires the homeowner to fill out a mortgage modification application and provide the documentation requested. The modification should also contain a hardship letter explaining that the homeowner has had a legitimate hardship situation that will motivate the bank loan servicer or investor to cooperate with them concerning obtaining a mortgage modification. In addition, most mortgage modification applications require the submission of tax returns, bank statements and pay stubs by the homeowner.

Home Affordable Mortgage Program (HAMP)

The federal mortgage lending program called HAMP is a program created by President Obama’s administration. This program does not work well. Approximately one homeowner in five is successful in obtaining a mortgage modification under this program. Many homeowners presume that they will be given a mortgage modification if they simply submit an application. This is simply not the case. The large majority of homeowners who submit mortgage modifications will never obtain a mortgage modification.

Banks and Financial Institutions

Many homeowners who come to my office presume that the financial institutions which hold their mortgages are interested in helping them. Unfortunately, that is generally not the case. The financial institutions which hold mortgages are interested in making money! If they find the homeowner does not meet their criteria related to the profitability of the mortgage, they usually will not grant a mortgage modification. Banks and other financial institutions are not social service agencies. They are financial institutions which seek to make a profit that benefits their shareholders. Not all homeowners are good candidates for mortgage modifications. However, there is a way of maximizing the potential of obtaining a mortgage modification. When homes are in foreclosure, and the homeowner retains counsel who submits numerous affirmative defenses and countersues the bank to set the mortgage aside, the banks and their attorneys pay more attention to the applications of these homeowners for modifications. This can increase the homeowners chances of obtaining a reasonable and fair mortgage modification. This is an example of the expression, “the squeaky wheel gets more grease.”

What You Shouldn’t Do When Facing Foreclosure

There are many published articles on the topic of what you should do if your home is going into foreclosure. This article is not going to discuss these issues. The purpose of this article is to tell you exactly what you shouldn’t do when facing the possibility of foreclosure.

The first thing you shouldn’t do is to sign over the deed to your home to someone else. Some despicable individuals and companies seek to take advantage of families in financial trouble by promising to get them their mortgages current. They have this bait and switch plan where they request you turn your home over to them. They then claim they will get a mortgage modification because their credit or circumstances is better than yours and thereafter they will sign the mortgage and deed back over to the beleaguered family. This is a bait and switch type of fraud designed to cause families to lose their homes. What these fraudulent companies do is refinance the property, take the equity out of the home, and thereafter let the foreclosure lawsuit proceed against the property. They then walk away from the situation leaving the homeowner in a worse situation than they were to begin with. Now there is no equity in their home, the homeowner no longer owns their home, and their options in dealing with the potential foreclosure are usually reduced or eliminated.

Do Not Ignore a Legal Document From the Bank or Their Lawyers

Facing a foreclosure lawsuit due to negative financial or personal circumstances can be difficult. It is easier to run from your life’s problems. However, ignoring the fact that your home is going into foreclosure is not a solution to your problem. This will exacerbate the problem by limiting the possibility of you and your family staying in your home. If you are contacted by your bank, mortgage company, or servicing company with requests, you should honor those requests and try to cooperate with them. If they are threatening you, you should hire a foreclosure attorney to advise you on how to deal with the situation. Competent, experienced foreclosure defense lawyers have developed a variety of techniques to help beleaguered homeowners stay in their homes.

Be Leery of Mortgage Modification Companies That Promise Stellar Results

There are many mortgage modification companies marketing their services to the public in the United States. Many of these companies more or less claim if you are breathing we will get you a mortgage modification. These companies are taking advantage of families in trouble. They present success rates which are usually unrealistic. Mortgage modification companies are no more successful in obtaining mortgage modifications for their customers than homeowners who submit mortgage modifications on their own. Many of these modification companies are hustlers taking advantage of people by asking for large up front fees based on false promises. Be sure to check with your local bar association, or the Better Business Bureau before hiring an attorney or mortgage modification company that claims they will get you a mortgage modification or stop your foreclosure from moving forward.

Loan Modifications: What Are They Really? Part 1

An Hour GlassA loan modification can be defined as an agreement between a homeowner and a financial institution that changes the terms of the original mortgage loan. Homeowners who have fallen behind on their mortgage payments or who are having financial difficulties should seek to modify their mortgage loan for the purpose of obtaining a reduction of their mortgage payments that fits into their financial circumstances. It should be noted that a loan modification application does not stop a foreclosure lawsuit from moving forward. Whenever a homeowner is sued in a foreclosure lawsuit they must file a written Answer to the Summons and Complaint with the court and with opposing counsel within twenty days if served personally and thirty days if served by any other means. Failure to submit an Answer, even if a mortgage modification application is submitted, is considered a default and an admission of the allegations in the lawsuit which allows the lawsuit to move forward unopposed.

Various Mortgage Modifications

There are a variety of ways in which a mortgage can be modified. Examples of the types of manners in which a mortgage can be modified are as follows:

  1. The interest rate can be reduced.
  2. Payment terms, which are usually over a thirty year period, can be extended to as long as forty years.
  3. The arrears on the mortgage can be placed at the end of the mortgage and the payment terms extended by the amount of months in which payments were missed.
  4. Penalties and attorneys fees concerning the mortgage can be waived.
  5. Interest and late fees concerning the mortgage payments can be waived.
  6. An adjustable rate mortgage can be converted to a conventional mortgage.
  7. An adjustable rate mortgage can be converted into an interest only mortgage or a fixed rate mortgage.

All of the aforementioned ways of modifying a mortgage can be used individually or in combination with each other to create a lower cost, more affordable, monthly mortgage payment for the beleaguered homeowner.

Elliot S. Schlissel is a foreclosure attorney representing homeowners throughout the New York Metropolitain area.

Defendant in Foreclosure Lawsuit Found Not Liable to Pay the Mortgage Debt

Law books on tableIn this case, the plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank NA, brought a residential foreclosure lawsuit against the defendant Seibold. During the course of the foreclosure proceedings, both parties brought motions before the court. Wells Fargo sought summary judgment authorizing them to sell the property and holding defendant Seibold liable. Seibold brought a motion requesting the case be dismissed and he be held not liable.

Judge Finds Problems With Mortgage Industry Practices

Justice Philip Straniere heard the case in a Supreme Court Part located in Richmond County, New York. Judge Straniere had problems with a variety of practices of the mortgage industry, and specifically with Wells Fargo with regards to defendant Seibold in this case. He questioned the circumstances under which Seibold, who did not sign the note, was added to the mortgage. He didn’t understand why the estate in this case was not made a party to the lawsuit. He questioned certain allegations with regard to the ownership of the property which was excluded from the pleadings of the plaintiff in their Complaint. In addition he wanted to know why the original transaction was scheduled as a first and second mortgage when really it was simply a single mortgage. He found that the setting up this transaction as two mortgages may have been the cause of the default on this obligation. He took the position that the lenders were engaged in deceptive practices in violation of New York’s General Business Law Section 349.

Justice Straniere concluded the defendant Seibold was not liable for the payment of this mortgage. He found he did not sign the note. He also found that Seibold had raised an issue of fact with regard to questions concerning an escrow shortage.

Conclusion

I find this to be a very troubling case. Here is a situation where a judge has basically accused Wells Fargo of a variety of improprieties. Unfortunately, my office has seen numerous cases where banks have been involved in improprieties. When we bring these improprieties to the attention of judges, more and more homeowners are relieved of their financial obligations by the judges leading these cases.

Elliot S. Schlissel is a foreclosure attorneys representing homeowners throughout the New York Metropolitain area.

Foreclosure Defense in Valley Stream, Lynbrook, Baldwin, Malverne, Freeport, Oceanside, Long Beach, Elmont, Lakeview, West Hempstead, Hempstead, Merrick and Bellmore, New York

We represent individuals throughout the New York Metropolitan area with divorce and child custody, personal injury, car accident, wrongful death, estate administration, nursing home and medicaid issues

The information you obtain at this website is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your particular legal issue. This is attorney advertising.

This is attorney advertising. This website is designed for general information purposes only. The information presented on this website shall not be construed to be legal advice. If you have a legal problem you should consult with an attorney.

Copyright © 2018 By The Law Offices of Schlissel DeCorpo. All Rights Reserved.